In Search of the Happiness Max

hestmord:

cognitivedissonance:

"someone wordfiltered ‘SJW’ to ‘skeleton’ on the GG subreddit

intercedeth:

"feminists and skeletons" might be my favorite of everything forever

Love

quick link to full image because you need to see “GamerGate supporter loses his job to skeletons on the rampage” in full resolution immediately

Oh my goodness, this is the best thing!

Somebody tagged  gamergate to an ELIZA style twitterbot*, and now it’s effectively trolling the tag and gamergaters are mansplaining to ‘her’.

IT IS THE FUNNIEST THING.

Graham Linehan @Glinner 57m57 minutes ago

"Any chance we can get Zoe to commit suicide?" What means.

coming from Gawker Media who’s corrupt journalists started the whole thing I’ll take this article with a pitch salt.

oh fuck. Off.

Robert Greally @RobertGreally 26m26 minutes ago

Why can’t I question the sources/motives/message of this article? what do you think of the campaign?

instead of accepting it on face value. writers have motives, facts can distorted etc. you may accept the article or you may not

You’re not really talking about me — are you ?

no sorry not your or specific person, was trying explain to 140 character :)

Eliza R. Barr @ElizaRBarr 27m27 minutes ago

Can you elaborate on that ?

with gamegate its hard to accept both sides on face value. neither side is exhibiting the hallmarks of professional journalism

right now, we have screenshots, used both sides to prove points, screenshots we can’t verify as real or shopped for the mostpart

I don’t think the game press has journalists that would be handle this. too many conflicts of interests/commercial pressures

***

Does talking about this bother you ?

No, I agree. Just spreading the word for someone who makes better videos about it :-)

I think is an interesting focus on bias in game media and also in this video who also has a biased view.

***

was culture jamming to recruit minorities TO USE AS A SHIELD. And if you call them out on it, will turn on you.

Finally people of will love seeing the way you talk about them as if the have no brain - NOT!

What would you do if the have no brain ?

They are human beings, in general they have brains
Click here to enjoy the CONFUSION.
For those not in the know, ELIZA the Computer Psychiatrist was an early chatbot, from the 1960s. It’s FAMOUS and can be quite hilairious to talk to. Once you’ve talked to her a bit it’s pretty easy to recognise her ‘speech’ patterns. So it’s really awesome to see these guys being pretty clueless with her.
[Edit:] Damnit! Somebody told them. Party-pooper!
40m40 minutes ago

GAMERGATE, IS LITERALLY ELIZA THE THERAPY BOT I AM FREAKING OUT, OH MY GOD ELIZAAAAA

abortionista:

hermiginnyharvelle:

Yooooooo someone buy me this [x]

OH MY GOD

OMG OMG OMG OMG

abortionista:

hermiginnyharvelle:

Yooooooo someone buy me this [x]

OH MY GOD

OMG OMG OMG OMG

tamthewriter:

monkeysaysficus:

solarbeans:

kirbomatic:

christmasblogger:

rin-ji:

I think this actually the best thing that’s ever been on my dash

DID THAT ACTUALLY JUST FUCKGIN HAPPEN

He has become one
He is free

fuCIM’M ACTUALLY CRYING HELPRDTJUYFIUIOKLF

What the hay??

WHAT IS THIS? WHAT HAS JUST HAPPENED?!

Ahahahahaahhaha!

the second gif in your folder is your muse trying to flirt

tamthewriter:

zarhooie:

copperbadge:

dorkilybeautiful:

beanmom:

theirstoryisepic:

thedevilsbartender:

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

Accurate, @tamthewriter?

I dunno, guys, I think there might be something wrong with me.

image

image

I don’t know who’s doing the flirting, here, but it seems to be effective.

Given the number of posts I have seen on Tumblr of people bonding over this practice, I feel like this can’t NOT have a place on my blog.

championsandheroes:

I’ve always wondered at some of the stat boosts you get in RPGs from armors. Like increased hostility from enemy units. My theory is that they are either super jealous or super fashion sensitive.

a-little-melancholy:

chaz-gelf:

sixmilliondeadinternets:

Gandhi has been historically the most aggressive character in Civilization due to an original bug in the first game that caused him to go all-out once he reaches democracy. They just kept the thing going ever since.


To further explain this bug, because I was chatting with mothmonarch about Civilization and other strategy games last night and I never got around to explaining this fully, but I love this story:
Gandhi’s AI in the original game had its aggression set to the absolute minimum (0 on a scale of 0 to 10, I believe, I may have this wrong but the basic idea I’m about to explain is accurate, as far as I can tell). Adopting democracy lowers an AI civ’s aggression by 2 points, so when someone who is fully peaceful loses two points of aggression, they should still be nice and polite, right?
Except this is an old DOS game, and so computer math is in place. What actually happened was that Gandhi’s aggression level ticked backwards two steps, from 0 to 255. On a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.
And that’s the story as I recall it, but again I may have gotten some details wrong, so feel free to correct me! After that, as the original poster said, the devs loved the bug so much that they just kept it in as a running joke!

“On a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.”I about pissed myself laughing at this.

Ahahahahahaha - the post came back to me. This is so fucking hilairious. I just think about how funny it is sometimes. Reblogging to keep this information of pure beauty circulating FOREVER.

a-little-melancholy:

chaz-gelf:

sixmilliondeadinternets:

Gandhi has been historically the most aggressive character in Civilization due to an original bug in the first game that caused him to go all-out once he reaches democracy. They just kept the thing going ever since.

To further explain this bug, because I was chatting with mothmonarch about Civilization and other strategy games last night and I never got around to explaining this fully, but I love this story:

Gandhi’s AI in the original game had its aggression set to the absolute minimum (0 on a scale of 0 to 10, I believe, I may have this wrong but the basic idea I’m about to explain is accurate, as far as I can tell). Adopting democracy lowers an AI civ’s aggression by 2 points, so when someone who is fully peaceful loses two points of aggression, they should still be nice and polite, right?

Except this is an old DOS game, and so computer math is in place. What actually happened was that Gandhi’s aggression level ticked backwards two steps, from 0 to 255On a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.

And that’s the story as I recall it, but again I may have gotten some details wrong, so feel free to correct me! After that, as the original poster said, the devs loved the bug so much that they just kept it in as a running joke!

On a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.”

I about pissed myself laughing at this.

Ahahahahahaha - the post came back to me. This is so fucking hilairious. I just think about how funny it is sometimes. Reblogging to keep this information of pure beauty circulating FOREVER.

terriblerealestateagentphotos:

Oddly, the current occupant has been kind enough to provide a live demo of the en suite.
Book now available on Amazon
Follow on Twitter @BadRealtyPhotos

Hahahahahaha!

terriblerealestateagentphotos:

Oddly, the current occupant has been kind enough to provide a live demo of the en suite.

Book now available on Amazon

Follow on Twitter @BadRealtyPhotos

Hahahahahaha!